| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your definition is very clear,and brief.But if you could show it diagramatically,it would hav been better. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Your definitions seem good to me, both correct and to the point. -Christen Juzeszyn | Your definitions seem good to me, both correct and to the point. -Christen Juzeszyn | ||
Revision as of 10:58, 17 September 2008
Your definition is very clear,and brief.But if you could show it diagramatically,it would hav been better.
Your definitions seem good to me, both correct and to the point. -Christen Juzeszyn
This is a complete and correct definition. However, I would have worded it differently. The way it is currently is a little confusing regarding the shifted output. I would have said "...yields the same result as time shifting the output signal by the same time shift.", but this definition is nonetheless correct and quite usable. -Zachary Curosh
This is a good definition for a time-variant/invariant system but it was a little confusing on the first read-through. -Aishwar Sabesan
