Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
 
 +
       
 
         Since, (1) & (2) are not equal to each other, A & C are not
 
         Since, (1) & (2) are not equal to each other, A & C are not
 
independent of each other when bits are biased.
 
independent of each other when bits are biased.
Line 25: Line 26:
 
         P(A=0,B=0) = P(A=1) . P(B=0) = (1-p).(1-p)                 (4)
 
         P(A=0,B=0) = P(A=1) . P(B=0) = (1-p).(1-p)                 (4)
  
 +
       
 
          
 
          
 
         Again, since (3) & (4) are not equal to each other, A & C are not
 
         Again, since (3) & (4) are not equal to each other, A & C are not

Revision as of 15:40, 16 September 2008



       A		B		


       P(A=1) = p	P(B=1) = p
       P(A=0) = 1-p	P(B=0) = 1-p			


       P(A=1,C=1) = P(A=1) . P(C=1) = p.{P(A=1,B=0)+P(A=0,B=1)} = 2.p^2.(1-p)		(1)
       P(A=1,B=0) = P(A=1) . P(B=0) = p.(1-p)		                 		(2)


       Since, (1) & (2) are not equal to each other, A & C are not

independent of each other when bits are biased.

                            "OR"        
       P(A=0,C=0) = P(A=0) . P(C=0) = (1-p).{P(A=1,B=1)+P(A=0,B=0)} = (p^2 + (1-p)^2).(1-p)	(3)
       P(A=0,B=0) = P(A=1) . P(B=0) = (1-p).(1-p)		                 		(4)


       Again, since (3) & (4) are not equal to each other, A & C are not

independent of each other when bits are biased.

       Hence, it is proved.

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett