(Proving the Sampling Theorem)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-- Proving the Sampling Theorem --
+
== Proving the Sampling Theorem ==
  
 
The sampling can be represented by "Impulse-train Sampling."
 
The sampling can be represented by "Impulse-train Sampling."
Line 11: Line 11:
 
<math>x_p(t) \rightarrow H(\omega) \rightarrow x_r(t)</math>
 
<math>x_p(t) \rightarrow H(\omega) \rightarrow x_r(t)</math>
  
Where <math>H(\omega)</math> is a filter with gain equal to the period of the signal and a cutoff frequency of <math>omega_c</math>.
+
Where <math>H(\omega)</math> is a filter with gain equal to the period of the signal and a cutoff frequency of <math>\omega_c</math>.
  
 
<math> \omega_c \rightarrow \omega_m < \omega_c < \omega_s - \omega_m</math>.
 
<math> \omega_c \rightarrow \omega_m < \omega_c < \omega_s - \omega_m</math>.
 +
 +
This process can be easily shown in the frequency domain graphically. An example is below.
 +
 +
[[Image:Freq_Domain_ECE301Fall2008mboutin.jpg|Graph]]

Latest revision as of 19:44, 10 November 2008

Proving the Sampling Theorem

The sampling can be represented by "Impulse-train Sampling."

$ x_p(t) = ? $ $ x_p(t) = x(t)p(t) $ $ x_p(t) = x(t)\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} \delta(t-nT) $

We can recover $ x(t) $ from $ x_p(t) $ as follows:

$ x_p(t) \rightarrow H(\omega) \rightarrow x_r(t) $

Where $ H(\omega) $ is a filter with gain equal to the period of the signal and a cutoff frequency of $ \omega_c $.

$ \omega_c \rightarrow \omega_m < \omega_c < \omega_s - \omega_m $.

This process can be easily shown in the frequency domain graphically. An example is below.

Graph

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. 2007, working on developing cool imaging technologies for digital cameras, camera phones, and video surveillance cameras.

Buyue Zhang