(Proving the Sampling Theorem)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-- Proving the Sampling Theorem --
+
== Proving the Sampling Theorem ==
  
 
The sampling can be represented by "Impulse-train Sampling."
 
The sampling can be represented by "Impulse-train Sampling."
Line 9: Line 9:
 
We can recover <math>x(t)</math> from <math>x_p(t)</math> as follows:
 
We can recover <math>x(t)</math> from <math>x_p(t)</math> as follows:
  
<math>x_p(t)</math> \rightarrow <math>H(omega)</math> \rightarrow <math>x_r(t)</math>
+
<math>x_p(t) \rightarrow H(\omega) \rightarrow x_r(t)</math>
  
Where <math>H(omega)</math> is a filter with gain equal to the period of the signal and a cutoff frequency of <math>omega_c</math>.
+
Where <math>H(\omega)</math> is a filter with gain equal to the period of the signal and a cutoff frequency of <math>\omega_c</math>.
  
<math>omega_c</math> satisfies <math>omega_m < omega_c < omega_s - omega_m<\math>.
+
<math> \omega_c \rightarrow \omega_m < \omega_c < \omega_s - \omega_m</math>.
 +
 
 +
This process can be easily shown in the frequency domain graphically. An example is below.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Freq_Domain_ECE301Fall2008mboutin.jpg|Graph]]

Latest revision as of 19:44, 10 November 2008

Proving the Sampling Theorem

The sampling can be represented by "Impulse-train Sampling."

$ x_p(t) = ? $ $ x_p(t) = x(t)p(t) $ $ x_p(t) = x(t)\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} \delta(t-nT) $

We can recover $ x(t) $ from $ x_p(t) $ as follows:

$ x_p(t) \rightarrow H(\omega) \rightarrow x_r(t) $

Where $ H(\omega) $ is a filter with gain equal to the period of the signal and a cutoff frequency of $ \omega_c $.

$ \omega_c \rightarrow \omega_m < \omega_c < \omega_s - \omega_m $.

This process can be easily shown in the frequency domain graphically. An example is below.

Graph

Alumni Liaison

BSEE 2004, current Ph.D. student researching signal and image processing.

Landis Huffman