(New page: Wow, nice job. You nailed every one of them. I would suggest examples but you did definitions for each property.)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Wow, nice job. You nailed every one of them.  I would suggest examples but you did definitions for each property.
+
Wow, nice job. You nailed every one of them.  I would suggest examples but you did definitions for each property. - Tyler Johnson
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Well done!<br>
 +
And I have a suggestion on the definition of non-causal system. I think as long as there EXISTS such an input (instead of for any input) that satisfies the situation, the system should be called non-causal.<br>
 +
Regards,
 +
 
 +
Xujun Huang

Latest revision as of 17:16, 19 September 2008

Wow, nice job. You nailed every one of them. I would suggest examples but you did definitions for each property. - Tyler Johnson


Well done!
And I have a suggestion on the definition of non-causal system. I think as long as there EXISTS such an input (instead of for any input) that satisfies the situation, the system should be called non-causal.
Regards,

Xujun Huang

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood