Line 1: Line 1:
<h2> On The Most Beautiful Equatin </h2>
+
== On The Most Beautiful Equatin ==
<p><b>e^(i*pi) + 1 =0</b>
+
 
</p><p>I am happy to have met Euler’s Identity outside of my college education. I was reading William Dunham’s The Mathematical Universe – a good read for anyone - and in its concluding chapter Z, Professor Dunham presented the Euler’s Identity. The effect was strong- I had read how mathematicians had labored to estimate the value of pi, the unnaturally frequent occurrence of the natural number e in our universe, the great baffle and nervous air among mathematical circle in formulating the notion of i, and here this superstar cast is thrown into a simple but complete scene with no other than the brilliant Euler as its playwright.  
+
'''e^(i*pi) + 1 =0'''
</p><p>It was pleasant to learn of the equation in this manner, I was even more pleased to learn that Euler’s Identity is a strong candidate for the crown of most beautiful mathematical equation (the competition is Maxwell’s Equation). By this time, I was informed that Euler’s Identity also casts two fundamental constant 0 (additive identity) and 1 (multiplicative identity) and also position the cast with three basic arithmetic operations: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation.  
+
 
I tried sharing the same enthusiasm I had with my mother, but she was not too impressed I think.  
+
I am happy to have met Euler’s Identity outside of my college education. I was reading William Dunham’s The Mathematical Universe – a good read for anyone - and in its concluding chapter Z, Professor Dunham presented the Euler’s Identity. The effect was strong- I had read how mathematicians had labored to estimate the value of pi, the unnaturally frequent occurrence of the natural number e in our universe, the great baffle and nervous air among mathematical circle in formulating the notion of i, and here this superstar cast is thrown into a simple but complete scene with no other than the brilliant Euler as its playwright.  
Perhaps the beauty of the Euler’s Identity is best capture in a form of poetry (haiku, specifically):
+
 
</p><p><br />
+
It was pleasant to learn of the equation in this manner, I was even more pleased to learn that Euler’s Identity is a strong candidate for the crown of most beautiful mathematical equation (the competition is Maxwell’s Equation). By this time, I was informed that Euler’s Identity also casts two fundamental constant 0 (additive identity) and 1 (multiplicative identity) and also position the cast with three basic arithmetic operations: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation.  
</p>
+
 
<hr />
+
I tried sharing the same enthusiasm I had with my mother, but she was not too impressed I think. Perhaps the beauty of the Euler’s Identity is best capture in a form of poetry (haiku, specifically):  
<p>“e to the i pi
+
 
Add one and you get zero
+
 
Is that weird or what?” –[<a href="http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&amp;t=19733">spdqbr</a>]
+
----
</p>
+
 
<hr />
+
“e to the i pi
<p>Yes, it is the strangest connection among the immensely important mathematical constants.
+
Add one and you get zero
Derivation
+
Is that weird or what?” –[[http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=19733 spdqbr]]  
I’ve found very simple derivation of Euler’s equation from a blog I cannot locate anymore. It only requires elementary calculus skills:
+
----
</p><p>This is certainly not the first time in which mathematics was able to draw unforeseen conclusion. For example, the number of primes up to a postivie number n approaches n/ln(n) as n approaches infinity, area under f(t), derivative of F(t), can be calculated by F(t) (well, this connection may seem rather unconnected to me for I haven’t given rigorous thought about it). Sometimes, I do wonder what the utility of that beautiful equation is any way, like an engineer. But if that isn’t interesting, what is?
+
 
</p>
+
Yes, it is the strangest connection among the immensely important mathematical constants. Derivation I’ve found very simple derivation of Euler’s equation from a blog I cannot locate anymore. It only requires elementary calculus skills:  
 +
 
 +
This is certainly not the first time in which mathematics was able to draw unforeseen conclusion. For example, the number of primes up to a postivie number n approaches n/ln(n) as n approaches infinity, area under f(t), derivative of F(t), can be calculated by F(t) (well, this connection may seem rather unconnected to me for I haven’t given rigorous thought about it). Sometimes, I do wonder what the utility of that beautiful equation is any way, like an engineer. But if that isn’t interesting, what is?

Revision as of 21:30, 8 December 2011

On The Most Beautiful Equatin

e^(i*pi) + 1 =0

I am happy to have met Euler’s Identity outside of my college education. I was reading William Dunham’s The Mathematical Universe – a good read for anyone - and in its concluding chapter Z, Professor Dunham presented the Euler’s Identity. The effect was strong- I had read how mathematicians had labored to estimate the value of pi, the unnaturally frequent occurrence of the natural number e in our universe, the great baffle and nervous air among mathematical circle in formulating the notion of i, and here this superstar cast is thrown into a simple but complete scene with no other than the brilliant Euler as its playwright.

It was pleasant to learn of the equation in this manner, I was even more pleased to learn that Euler’s Identity is a strong candidate for the crown of most beautiful mathematical equation (the competition is Maxwell’s Equation). By this time, I was informed that Euler’s Identity also casts two fundamental constant 0 (additive identity) and 1 (multiplicative identity) and also position the cast with three basic arithmetic operations: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation.

I tried sharing the same enthusiasm I had with my mother, but she was not too impressed I think. Perhaps the beauty of the Euler’s Identity is best capture in a form of poetry (haiku, specifically):



“e to the i pi

Add one and you get zero
Is that weird or what?” –[spdqbr] 

Yes, it is the strangest connection among the immensely important mathematical constants. Derivation I’ve found very simple derivation of Euler’s equation from a blog I cannot locate anymore. It only requires elementary calculus skills:

This is certainly not the first time in which mathematics was able to draw unforeseen conclusion. For example, the number of primes up to a postivie number n approaches n/ln(n) as n approaches infinity, area under f(t), derivative of F(t), can be calculated by F(t) (well, this connection may seem rather unconnected to me for I haven’t given rigorous thought about it). Sometimes, I do wonder what the utility of that beautiful equation is any way, like an engineer. But if that isn’t interesting, what is?

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn