| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Is it sufficient if we show that <math> f \in L^{r} </math>? | Is it sufficient if we show that <math> f \in L^{r} </math>? | ||
| − | And I think I can prove that <math> f \in L^{r} </math> even though <math> f \notin L^{p} </math> | + | And I think I can prove that <math> f \in L^{r} </math> even though <math> f \notin L^{p} </math>. |
- Jin hak | - Jin hak | ||
Revision as of 23:49, 10 July 2008
(A quick question about pb. 7.3)
Is it sufficient if we show that $ f \in L^{r} $?
And I think I can prove that $ f \in L^{r} $ even though $ f \notin L^{p} $.
- Jin hak
