| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
- Jin hak | - Jin hak | ||
| + | |||
| + | Unless you saw a simpler way than I did, I don't think it suffices. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -Pete | ||
Revision as of 12:35, 11 July 2008
(A quick question about pb. 7.3)
Is it sufficient if we show that $ f \in L^{r} $?
I think I can prove that $ f \in L^{r} $ even though $ f \notin L^{p} $.
- Jin hak
Unless you saw a simpler way than I did, I don't think it suffices.
-Pete
