(New page: Your definitions are correct, well done, and to the point, an example might have added a little more. -Eric Smith)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Your definitions are correct, well done, and to the point, an example might have added a little more. -Eric Smith
 
Your definitions are correct, well done, and to the point, an example might have added a little more. -Eric Smith
 +
 +
----
 +
I think your definition is too broad without any examples, you are just stating what the proffessor said in class without trying to show it.  Anybody could have put that answer and i think it is based on lazyness on your part.
 +
 +
----
 +
While your definitions could be considered correct I think they are to vague, escpecially for the "not" example. I would suggest refine your definitions or atleast adding an example to clarify more. -Josh Long

Latest revision as of 07:52, 19 September 2008

Your definitions are correct, well done, and to the point, an example might have added a little more. -Eric Smith


I think your definition is too broad without any examples, you are just stating what the proffessor said in class without trying to show it. Anybody could have put that answer and i think it is based on lazyness on your part.


While your definitions could be considered correct I think they are to vague, escpecially for the "not" example. I would suggest refine your definitions or atleast adding an example to clarify more. -Josh Long

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett