(New page: == Find the Bug == The original code: F0 = 13; T0 = 1/F0; Ts = 0.07; t = 0:Ts:13*T0; x = real(exp(j*(2*pi*F0*t-pi/2))); plot(t,x) The fixed code: F0 = 13; T0 = 1/F0; Ts = 0.0005...)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:31, 12 September 2008

Find the Bug

The original code:

F0 = 13;

T0 = 1/F0;

Ts = 0.07;

t = 0:Ts:13*T0;

x = real(exp(j*(2*pi*F0*t-pi/2)));

plot(t,x)


The fixed code:

F0 = 13;

T0 = 1/F0;

Ts = 0.0005;

t = 0:Ts:13*T0;

x = real(exp(j*(2*pi*F0*t-pi/2)));

plot(t,x)


The Bug in the problem is the rate of sampling is much too big and needs to be made smaller in order to show the right thing

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva