(New page: == Find the bug == This is an easy bug to spot. Although the given equation appears to be complex, it is correct. The problem is that the sampling frequency is given to be almost the exa...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Find the bug == | == Find the bug == | ||
This is an easy bug to spot. Although the given equation appears to be complex, it is correct. The problem is that the sampling frequency is given to be almost the exact same as the function period, meaning that it may only mark points about once every period: | This is an easy bug to spot. Although the given equation appears to be complex, it is correct. The problem is that the sampling frequency is given to be almost the exact same as the function period, meaning that it may only mark points about once every period: | ||
| + | |||
[[Image:hw2b_1 tyler_ECE301Fall2008mboutin]] | [[Image:hw2b_1 tyler_ECE301Fall2008mboutin]] | ||
Revision as of 14:15, 11 September 2008
Find the bug
This is an easy bug to spot. Although the given equation appears to be complex, it is correct. The problem is that the sampling frequency is given to be almost the exact same as the function period, meaning that it may only mark points about once every period:
File:Hw2b 1 tyler ECE301Fall2008mboutin
..:p very unfortunate looking
When the sampling frequency is made much smaller, the function turns attractive.
File:Hw2b 2 tyler ECE301Fall2008mboutin
much better, nice try at tricks though
