Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
On number 5, I have been able to prove the => for all three of them, but I am struggling with the <= for (i) and (ii).  Any hints on where to start?-Lauren  
 
On number 5, I have been able to prove the => for all three of them, but I am struggling with the <= for (i) and (ii).  Any hints on where to start?-Lauren  
 +
 +
for ii <=, can we do theorem 21?  we know some equal angles.  This would make for some equal sides if the sines are equal and than work around that?  - Sue
  
  

Revision as of 10:09, 29 September 2009


On number 5, I have been able to prove the => for all three of them, but I am struggling with the <= for (i) and (ii). Any hints on where to start?-Lauren

for ii <=, can we do theorem 21? we know some equal angles. This would make for some equal sides if the sines are equal and than work around that? - Sue



Back to Homework Discussion Page


Back to Prof. Walther MA460 page.

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood